Different types of AAPtards

After closely observing AAP for over a year, I have come to the conclusion that AAPtards can broadly be classified into the below-mentioned categories. These categories are intricately interlinked and there is high possibility of an AAPtard belonging to many categories. 

1.       The gullible supporters: These AAPtards believe that AAP is the only honest party and Kejriwal is the only honest politician. According to them, AAP is a revolutionary party which can bring overnight change, not only in our country, but in the whole universe. They also think that all persons who support other parties are corrupt and have been bought by Ambani and Adani. They carry proofs of the entire media being sold out to BJP. They are most easily fooled and tricked into believing that AAP's agenda is the best, no matter what it really is. In short, they believe everything they read and hear from their leaders. Most of them are college students who had hitherto no interest in politics but have lately been impressed by Kejriwal’s getup and his educational background.

2.       The communist AAPtards: These AAPtards want free water, subsidized electricity, and no taxes. They want to see all the rich people of the world burn in hell. They believe every government entity and the government itself is a private property of every citizen. These are the people who made foreign women urinate in public (Somnath Bharti), they believe that any group of 10-20 persons has the right to raid any hospital, school or police station and suspend anyone who doesn’t follow their commands. Just before the dawn of the AAP, their politics was on the verge of extinction, the political spectrum of our country had no space for their ideology. They have now found solace in AAP. CPI (M)’s Karat hails Kejriwal’s AAP as communist

3.       The Modi haters: These AAPtards don’t have any long-term political commitment to AAP. They support AAP only because they hate Modi and no other party currently matches the level of AAP’s Modi-hatred in their DNA. From branding Modi as a fascist, murderer, communal and corrupt to passing obscene remarks about his married life, these AAPtards try everything to disparage him. They have no principles, neither do they have any political ambition or aspirations from AAP; they are plain Modi-haters and nothing else.       

4.       The super-seculars: These are the people who organize candle marches for the so-called victims of Gaza, still mourn over 2002, but don’t even want to talk about the plight of Kashmiri Pandits. They shed tears for the children of Peshawar but have no regard for the slain children of Assam. Their politics was exterminated by the Indian voter in the Lok-Sabha, Maharashtra, Haryana and Jharkhand elections. Now, they have seen a new light in AAP as it is not hated as much as the other super-secular parties. Their politics  ranges from calling RSS a ‘Hindu terrorist organization’ to demanding reservations for ‘religious minorities’. 

5.       The blind followers: These AAPtards are the only species to have IQ below zero. In their blind admiration of AAP, they have lost all their capability to think rationally. They are mostly found commenting on Facebook pages (no matter what the post is, they will write about AAP and BJP off course). They are expert in giving ‘honesty certificates' to everyone who joins AAP. Note that the certificates are valid only till the person remains an AAPtard, as soon as he changes side, he will be known as a corrupt mercenary agent of the BJP. They believe that a wrong thing done by AAP is better than that done by the BJP. They don’t have any logical arguments but have the extraordinary power of defaming and stigmatizing any person by disseminating misinformation. 

   

6.       The Naxal supporters: They have mastered the art of mass protests, burning public property, anarchy, and hooliganism. They are experts in stalling the parliament and  opposing every kind of constitutional work. They oppose nuclear plants, coal plants, dams, SEZs and all private investment; after that they stage protests for electricity problems and lack of employment. They have become AAPtards because most of the AAP leaders (including Kejriwal himself) share, more or less, the same spirit of anarchism.  AAP wants Naxals in its fold

7.       The terrorist sympathizers: These type of AAPtards want Kashmir to be gifted to Pakistan, they demand presidential pardon to terrorists and call the Batla House encounter ‘a conspiracy’. Just a few days ago, these persons were seen justifying the Charlie Hebdo killings. They can convince you that RSS is more dangerous than ISIS, Taliban, and  LeT. Prashant Bhushan is one of them (though I respect his work as a lawyer). Some tweets of another AAP leader.  

PS: If any AAPtard feels that he/she is not fitting in any of the categories, please let me know.

Ridiculous 11 P.M. Rule of ISM Dhanbad

In-time for students (no student can remain outside his hostel gate after 11 P.M.) in hostels has been the most discussed and debated issue of ISM. For the last few years, it continues to be in the 'issues raised' section in various meetings of ISS, but so far ISM administration has paid no heed to this demand.  Most students (in fact every student) want this rule to be scrapped.

The reason given by the admins in support of this rule is hilarious. Argument is given that this rule is only for the safety of students because any mishap can happen during the night. This argument is as strong as saying that "To avoid molestation, women should stay at home". Doesn't the administration know that most of the students here are adults? Students here possess the same security threat as any other person of our country. What if the government imposes this kind of ban on every person to stay inside their house to reduce the crimes? Will anyone accept this? In a free and democratic society where every person has the right to do anything as long as it is not obnoxious to other citizens, where the government is about to decriminalize attempt to suicide, imposing these kind of bans in the name of maintaining discipline and ensuring safety is egregious.

There are other ways to ensure safety of students during the night. There are already enough guards in the campus, but still numbers of guards can be increased for added security. And instead of banning students why not ban outsiders after 11 pm since they are the potential offender to the students, students should be told to carry I-cards to distinguish them from strangers. Regular and strict checking of I-cards should be done and outsiders can be punished with a fine or something else. Even after having so many guards, if safety of students cannot be ensured within the small premises of ISM which is confined by boundary walls where no palpable evidences of ‘criminal-on-prowl' are available, just imagine the plight of the common man living in open societies where no significant police or security is available.

All the possible problems can be sorted out, but the ISM administration is too defensive to take any step to abolish this rule.  For the administration, it also serves as an excuse to prevent students from getting involved in ‘bad habits' like studying till late night in the library. In reality, admins are using this rule to hide the insufficiency of available night-staff. Now that we are bragging about the new library which would be Asia’s largest academic library, it would be unfortunate if this rule is continued; people would laugh at us. The ISM administration should consider the demands of students and completely erase this rule.